Betrayed
Home ] Up ]

   Breaking News exposing members of house and senate  

World News Today

                                                                       by Dove777.com

                                                                                                         Men and women fighting the Bush war! what are you doing?

 

PAME10512122000.jpg (11521 bytes)

 

                                                                                                                                         American Blog

                                                                            

 

I am here today to declare that Columbine was not just a tragedy -- it was a spiritual event that should be forcing us to look at where the real blame lies! Much of the blame lies here in this room. Much of the blame lies behind the pointing fingers of the accusers themselves. I wrote a poem just four nights ago that expresses my feelings best. This was written way before I knew I would be speaking here today:

Your laws ignore our deepest needs,
Your words are empty air.
You've stripped away our heritage,
You've outlawed simple prayer.
Now gunshots fill our classrooms,
And precious children die.
You seek for answers everywhere,
And ask the question "Why?"
You regulate restrictive laws,
Through legislative creed.
And yet you fail to understand,
That God is what we need!

 

 

 

The American people betrayed by the people they trusted and elected!

 

Thanks Mr President!

 


What kind of man would start a war based on lies and deception, then betray the men and women who become disabled. Bush did this alone with other republicans in office!

OPPOSE S2674/HR5509 Which Discriminate Against Disabled Veterans
Oppose S2674/HR5509 Which Discriminate Against Disabled Veterans

Take Action!

Please send the following message to your elected officials and candidates for office --

As a disabled veteran and your voting constituent, I am most concerned with the provisions of Senator Burr's America's Wounded Warrior Act (S 2674) and Representative Buyer's Nobel Warrior Act (HR 5509), which would drastically change the disability compensation system for America's veterans. These bills are loosely based on the recommendations of the President's Commission on Care for America's Wounded Warriors (Dole/Shalala Commission), but the specifics of these bills would do great harm to these veterans in the following ways:

* Offset VA Disability Compensation by Social Security when the veteran ages 65.

* Apply to all currently discharging veterans AND any veteran under VA's current compensation system who files a subsequent claim for additional benefits.

* Once under the new system the veteran cannot return to the current system.

* Protection for ratings in effect for 10 or more years would no longer apply.

* Would require the VA Secretary to examine or consider:
    (a) "the extent to which disability compensation may be used as an incentive to undergo treatment"
    (b) "the appropriate injuries to be covered under the new disability rating system"
    (c) "age" as a determining factor when considering average loss of earnings capacity

* Amends the law to provide the Secretary with authority to adopt and apply a rating schedule for "specific injuries." This provision would expressly limit VA authority over the Rating Schedule and places the authority in the hands of Congress. If the Congress can not correct the Sustained Growth Rate formula of Medicare Law how can we expect the Congress to do any better with the much more complex Disability Rating Schedule?

* Provides for a quality of life payment, but only for those enrolled in the "new" compensation system.

* Allows or suggests: That VA "may take into account the effect on potential future earnings caused by the age of the veteran at the time a disability rating is assigned." This provision would allow VA to compensate an older veteran at a lower percentage of disability than a younger veteran for the exact same disease or injury. Is this not age discrimination?

* Provides that
    (a) "as frequently as [the VA] considers it appropriate, [the VA] must reevaluate and ... adjust the disability rating for any veteran receiving compensation;"
    (b) the VA "must ... take into account any adjustments in the rating schedule that occurred since the last assignment of a rating;"
    (c) The frequency of reevaluations would be determined by an examining physician. This places physicians back in the rating business, allows for frequent "adjustments" to a veteran's rating based on perceived improvement, and further allows reductions based on a change in the rating criteria even when no improvement in the disability is shown.

For these reasons, among others, I strongly urge you to oppose S2674/HR5509 and any other legislation which is detrimental to and/or discriminatory against this nation's veterans.

 


Rob from the disabled veterans and elderly, give to people who are to lazy to work!

 


Welfare Poem - oh boy you will love this

...
I cross ocean,
poor and broke,
Take bus,
see employment folk.

Nice man treat me
good in there,
Say I need to
see welfare.


Welfare say,
'You come no more,
We send cash
right to your door.'


Welfare checks,
they make you wealthy,
Medicaid it keep
you healthy!


By and by,
I get plenty money,
Thanks to you,
American dummy.


Write to friends
in motherland,
Tell them 'come
fast as you can.'


They come in turbans
and Ford trucks,
I buy big house
with welfare bucks


They come here,
we live together,
More welfare checks,
it gets better!

Fourteen families,
they moving in,
But neighbor's patience
wearing thin.


Finally, white guy
moves away,
Now I buy his house,
and then I say,
'Find more aliens
for house to rent.'
And in the yard
I put a tent.


Send for family
they just trash,
But they, too,
draw the welfare cash!
Everything is
very good,
And soon we
own the neighborhood.


We have hobby
it's called breeding,
Welfare pay
for baby feeding.


Kid's need dentist?
Wife's need pills?
We get free!
We got no bills!


American's crazy!
He pay all year,
To keep welfare
running here.


We think America

darn good place!
Too darn good for

the white man race.
If they no like us, they can

scram,
Got lots of room in Pakistan ..

It is interesting that the federal government provides a
single refugee with a monthly allowance of $1,890.00
and each can also get an additional $580.00 in social assistance for a total of$2,470.00 .

This compares very well to a single pensioner who after contributing to the growth and development of America for 40 to 50 years can only receive a monthly maximum of $1,012.00 in old age pension and Guaranteed Income Supplement.

Maybe our pensioners should apply as refugees!

Lets send this to all Americans, so we can all be ticked off
and maybe we can get the refugees cut back to
$1,012.00 and the pensioners up to $2,470 00 and enjoy some of the money we
were forced to submit to the Government over the last 40 or 50 years.

Please forward to every American to expose what our elected politicians have been doing over the past 11 years - to the over-taxed American.

SEND THIS TO EVERY AMERICAN TAXPAYER YOU KNOW

Americans need to stand up and remove the people from office that lied under oath to protect us and the constitution. Men and women fight and die thinking we are keeping this nation free and politicians in secret is giving this nation away!

 


Thanks to the Bush admnistration, his father and corrupt members of congress who has betrayed the voters and this nation. It is time for the voters of this nation to stand up and remove the corrupt politicians from office and restore american back to the foundation buit by our founding fathers! Before you wake up one morning and you find that America is no more!

PREMEDITATED MERGER
NAFTA Superhighway traffic tied to bridge collapse
WND uncovers federal study warning of high risk in 1998

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Evidence of increasing international trade truck traffic on Interstate 35 through Minnesota raises concerns that NAFTA Superhighway traffic contributed to last week's collapse of the freeway bridge in Minneapolis.

 


President George W. Bush, aboard Marine One, takes an aerial survey of the Interstate 35W bridge collapse in Minneapolis, Saturday, Aug. 4, 2007

WND has unearthed a Federal Highway Administration report dating back to 1998 that warned increasing NAFTA truck traffic was expected to create a safety concern with bridges in states along the I-35 NAFTA Superhighway, including Minnesota.

The study concluded that, "The I-35 Corridor's multimodal transportation hubs – where air, rail, river, and truck cargo converge – make I-35 ideally positioned to be a major route for what is expected to be increasing levels of international trade activity."

The study warned that, "Over the next few decades, about 65 percent of I-35 will require major upgrades, however the entire route will have a continued need for rehabilitating pavements, resurfacing sections of the highway, and providing replacements of some bridge decks. Bridge substructures and superstructures will also need to be maintained, requiring repairs to maintain the integrity of the bridges."

The FHWA study was conducted in conjunction with the Departments of Transportation in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Iowa and Minnesota, and assessed I-35 from Laredo, Texas, to Duluth, Minn.

A comprehensive study of freight traffic conducted by the Federal Highway Administration, or FHWA, shows conclusively a large percentage of the freight carried through Minnesota is carried by truck.

FHWA data show that in 2002, a total of 280.7 million tons of freight moved through Minnesota, 86 percent of which was carried by truck.

The trend line shows dramatic increases projected, with freight traffic through Minnesota expected to double by 2035, to a total of 551.5 million tons, of which 88 percent will be carried by truck.

The bridge collapsed at rush hour, with an estimated 100-150 trucks and trains on the structure in bumper-to-bumper traffic.

Officials in Minnesota had been warned since 1990 that the bridge was "structurally deficient" and severely fatigued from the increasing volume of traffic the bridge, which spans the Mississippi River along Interstate 35, was receiving.

North America's SuperCorridor Coalition, Inc. (NASCO), a Dallas-based trade association, also designates I-35 as a NAFTA Superhighway.

NASCO's website states, "There are no plans to build a new NAFTA Superhighway – it exists today as I-35."

The original 2005 NASCO website opened with a graphic map of I-35 that highlighted in yellow the continental nature of the I-35 NAFTA Superhighway, illustrating clearly the highway's links into Mexico and Canada.

 


NASCO's original map highlighted the I-35 corridor from Mexico to Canada

WND has previously reported the Minnesota Department of Transportation joined NASCO as a member in 2006, after a heavy lobbying campaign launched by NASCO executive director Tiffany Melvin.

As fully documented on the Texas Department of Transportation website, the department plans to build a new Trans-Texas Corridor parallel to Interstate 35, and NASCO has yet to repudiate these new superhighway construction plans.

The debate whether or not to build a new TTC-like NAFTA Superhighway parallel to I-35 or to repair and rebuild I-35 to accommodate NAFTA and other global trade traffic required by 2025 and beyond, including projections of international truck and train freight travel, is now being debated by the states north of I-35.

As WND has reported, Oklahoma City Mayor Mick Cornett has repudiated his signing in 2004 of a document described as "The Declaration of North American Integration."

Cornett told WND he was opposed to the creation of a North American Union or the extension of TTC-35 into Oklahoma, "if the whole point is to make it cheaper to transport containers from China coming through Mexican ports."

WND has also reported Oklahoma House Speaker Lance Cargill has invited to Oklahoma Robert Poole, a prominent expert advising states to build toll roads as "public-private partnerships," complete with financing from private investment consortia seeking long-term operating leases on the new highways once completed, according to the Trans-Texas Corridor model.

 


President Bush one and two plus the Republicans in congress that took a sworn oath to protect the constitution and this nation

betrayed the American people and breached the trust they swore to keep.you have the power to stopt them, go below and write your members of congress

and remove the ones that have breached gtheir oath of office.

 


 

If you vote for Clinton,Obama,Biden, McCain and Dodd, this is what you will get!

 

   On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 23:35:23 -0500, "Colonel Harry
>   Riley USA ret"  wrote:
>   
>                                   Senators,
>   
>   Your vote against an amendment to the Immigration
>   Bill, 1348, to make English America's official language is astounding. On D-Day no less when we honor those
>   that sacrificed in order to secure the bedrock
>   character and principles of America. I can only surmise your vote reflects a loyalty to illegal aliens.
>   I don't much care where you come from, what your
>   religion is, whether you're black, white or some other color, male or female, democrat, republican or
>   independent, but I do care when you're a United States
>   Senator, representing citizens of America and vote against English as the official language of the United States.
>   Your vote reflects betrayal, political surrender,
>   violates your pledge of allegiance, dishonors historical principle, rejects patriotism, borders on
>   Traitorous action and, in my opinion makes you unfit
>   to serve as a United States
>   Senator...impeachment, recall, or other appropriate
>   action is warranted.
>   Worse, four of you voting against English as America
>   's official language are presidential candidates: Senator Biden, Senator Clinton, Senator Dodd, and Senator Obama.
>   Four Senators vying to lead America but won't or don't
>   have the courage to cast a vote in favor of English as America 's official language when 91% of American citizens want English officially designated as our language.
>   This is the second time in the last several months
>   this list of Senators have
>   disgraced themselves as political hacks.....unworthy
>   as Senators and certainly unqualified to serve as President of the United States -------Do not VOTE for them or any other that vote against having English as our language!
>   ..
>   If America is as angry as I am, you will realize a back-lash so stunning it will literally rock you out of your panties...and
>   preferably totally out of the United States Senate.
>   The entire immigration bill is a farce...your action
>   only confirms this really isn't about America , it's about self-serving politics....despicable at best.
>   
>   "Never argue with an idiot (Politician); they'll drag you down to
>   their level and beat you
>   with experience." ~ anonymous
>   The following senators voted against making English
>   the official language of America  and should be recalled!
>   
>   Akaka (D-HI)
>   Bayh (D-IN)
>   Biden (D-DE) Wants to be President?
>   Bingaman (D-NM)
>   Boxer (D-CA)
>   Cantwell (D-WA)
>   Clinton (D-NY) Wants to be President?
>   Dayton (D-MN)
>   Dodd (D-CT) Wants to be President
>   Domenici (R-NM) Coward, protecting his Senate seat...
>   Durbin (D-IL)
>   Feingold (D-WI) Not unusual for him
>   Feinstein (D-CA)
>   Harkin (D-IA)
>   Inouye (D-HI)
>   Jeffords (I-VT)
>   Kennedy (D-MA)
>   Kerry (D-MA) Wanted to be President
>   Kohl (D-WI)
>   Lautenberg (D-NJ)
>   Leahy (D-VT)
>   Levin (D-MI)
>   Lieberman (D-CT) Disappointment here.....
>   Menendez (D-NJ)
>   Mikulski (D-MD)
>   Murray (D-WA)
>   Obama (D-IL) Wants to be President
>   Reed (D-RI)
>   Reid (D-NV) Senate Majority Leader
>   Salazar (D-CO)
>   Sarbanes (D-MD)
>   Schumer (D-NY)
>   Stabenow (D-M
>   "Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime
>   that damage morale, and
>   undermine the military are saboteurs and should be
>   arrested, exiled or hanged."
>   President Abraham Lincoln
>   Psalm 94....
>   Additional comment:
>   We voted for change and boy are we getting it...and.
>   my feeling is, we ain't seen nothin yet......they haven't finished with wrecking our country or our military yet!
>   Think about it Our Independence, WWI, WWII, and others
>   "If It Weren't For The United States military"
>   "There Would Be NO United States of America "
>   "Home of The Free, Because of the Brave"
>   
>   Note:  Different languages (refer to "babbling") are a
>   basis for mistrust and divisiveness.  Government
>   spends billions providing legal papers, ballots, etc.
>   in multiple languages when they should all be in
>   English ??? .

 


 

Bush Sides With Mexican Killers Against U.S.
By Cliff Kincaid
June 13, 2007

The State Department's top legal adviser told international lawyers on June 6 that President Bush is so committed to the primacy of international law that he has taken his home state of Texas to court on behalf of a group of Mexican killers. The Mexicans had been sentenced to death for murdering U.S. citizens, including young children.

John B. Bellinger III, legal adviser to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, cited the case, Mexico v. United States of America, in trying to convince the attorneys that the administration is doing what it can to enforce international law in U.S. courts.

In the case, Bush has come down on the same side as the U.N.'s International Court of Justice (ICJ), which ruled 14-1 on behalf of Mexico against the U.S. The ICJ was headed at the time by a judge from communist China, who also ruled against the U.S.

Bellinger's audience was gathered at The Hague, a city in the Netherlands which is home to over 100 international organizations, including the U.N.'s International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court.

Sworn in as the Legal Adviser to the Secretary of State on April 8, 2005, Bellinger is described by the State Department as "the principal adviser on all domestic and international law matters to the Department of State, the Foreign Service, and the diplomatic and consular posts abroad."

The Bellinger speech, designed to convince the pro-U.N. globalists in attendance that Bush is really on their side, should have been big news. Not only did he praise Bush for coming down on the side of foreign killers of Americans, in a major court case with international implications, but he demonstrated how far the administration is prepared to go to impress the "international community."

In a major disclosure, Bellinger said that Bush is currently seeking immediate Senate ratification of 35 different "treaty packages." He said these include the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), a measure rejected by President Reagan and his U.N. Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick. Bellinger didn't name any of the other "treaty packages" that the administration wants to push through. But a number of radical treaties are known to be pending before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, headed by Democratic presidential candidate and Senator Joseph Biden.

Once again, it appears that Bush wants to ignore the concerns of conservatives in order to work with liberal Democrats and advance a controversial legislative agenda.

International Law

"To put it simply," Bellinger said, "our critics sometimes paint the United States as a country willing to duck or shrug off international obligations when they prove constraining or inconvenient. That picture is wrong. The United States does believe that international law matters. We help develop it, rely on it, abide by it,